When Secure Design Still Fails: Lessons From the Field
When Secure Design Still Fails: Lessons From the Field
Designing a network with VLANs and firewalls should keep each zone safe — in theory. In practice, even the best plans can crumble with one wrong setting. I’ve seen rural small businesses and farms with “segmented” networks that turned out to be wide-open after an attacker found a tiny gap. For example, I once helped a country clinic set up VLANs for staff, guests, and IoT devices. The consultant was proud of the design, but a missing pfSense rule meant the guest VLAN could still ping the staff printers and file shares. As pfSense’s own docs warn, “VLANs are not inherently insecure, but misconfiguration can leave a network vulnerable”. In other words: don’t trust your trust zones by default.
One memorable incident: a compromised IoT camera on a mis-tagged VLAN could suddenly scan the internal network. I sketched out the attack path with a mermaid diagram to show how a single bad rule caused a chain reaction.
flowchart LR Attacker["Remote Attacker"] -->|Exploit Wi-Fi| IoT["IoT Device (VLAN A)"] IoT -->|VLAN mis-configuration| Corp["Office Network (VLAN B)"] Corp -->|Data & Control| Attacker
In that case the attacker needed only wireless access to the clinic’s Wi-Fi (which wasn’t segmented), then jumped from the IoT VLAN into the main VLAN because the firewall wasn’t explicitly blocking it. VLAN segmentation is supposed to isolate zones, but if the switch or firewall is mis-set, one compromised gadget can roam freely. This matches what CISA and the NSA have seen: “Lack of network segmentation” is listed among the top ten misconfigurations in real networks. Small networks often skip the nitty-gritty access rules, so a trust boundary (VLAN) meant to block traffic turned out to be just cosmetic.
Another time I worked with an auto-shop that used pfSense. They carefully wrote firewall rules to isolate their payment system VLAN, but forgot that pfSense evaluates rules top-down. A broad “allow all” rule on the LAN ended up applying to the new VLAN too, thanks to rule ordering. By default pfSense blocks between VLANs only if you add rules – which we hadn’t. In effect, the segmentation was ineffective. pfSense documentation even suggests separate physical switches for different trust levels because “a simple misconfiguration of the switch could lead to unfiltered Internet traffic entering the internal network”. In small setups we often try to save hardware with one switch, but the risk is plain: one cable in the wrong place and Internet packets flow where they shouldn’t.
Software flaws can make matters worse. For instance, a recent pfSense exploit (CVE-2024-57273) let attackers hijack its Automatic Configuration Backup. Because the backup API key was derived from an exposed SSH key, a remote attacker could inject JavaScript into pfSense’s admin interface and even delete backups without knowing the admin password. In the field I’ve urged every client to update pfSense ASAP – those holes are real. Similarly, home/small office routers running OpenWrt can silently sprout bugs. A 2024 OpenWrt flaw allowed an unauthenticated attacker to poison the firmware update process (by causing a hash collision) and push malicious firmware of their choice. In practice this means even your trusted router can become a Trojan if its update server is tricked.
Then there are the developer habits: we all love GitHub and Docker, but secrets slip out. A single private key or OAuth token in a Docker Hub autobuild can leak entire servers. For example, late in 2024 Docker Hub detected a breach involving OAuth credentials for Bitbucket integrations. (They had to invalidate every token to stay safe.) In small shops I’ve seen engineers accidentally commit service account keys into repos or use shared Docker images without checking contents. Each such slip means the “secure” design crumbles: attackers can piggyback on our trust in code repositories and container registries.
Hard-Won Lessons (Field Checklist):
- Validate VLAN & Trunk configs: Always verify that VLAN tags and native VLANs are assigned exactly as intended. Avoid using default VLAN 1 when possible, and double-check switch and firewall ports for unexpected untagged traffic.
- Enforce “deny all” per zone: Rather than opening then limiting, start with an explicit deny for each new VLAN/interface in pfSense. Add only the rules you need, since pfSense won’t block inter-VLAN traffic unless you tell it.
- Update router/firewall firmware: Patches matter even for small devices. The pfSense and OpenWrt bugs above show that overlooked firewall code can be catastrophic. Treat firewall/router updates with as much urgency as your desktop systems.
- Monitor cross-zone traffic: Log and review firewall hits. If your logs show unexpected PC-to-IoT chatter or DHCP requests from odd VLANs, that’s a red flag of segmentation failure. Use packet captures or intrusion-detection on critical segments to catch any VLAN leaks in action.
- Treat DMZs and IoT as untrusted: Where possible, isolate risky devices on their own hardware or guest networks with strict egress-only rules. Even one safe-looking smart camera should live on its own VLAN with no routes back in.
- Secure developer environments: Rotate secrets regularly and audit code repos. Integrate tools (like GitGuardian) to alert on credentials in Git, and use branch protection so that no one can accidentally merge a commit exposing a key. Avoid building production containers on unverified images or with non-expiring tokens.
- Plan for breach, even in small ops: Make sure there’s an incident plan. Keep immutable backups of configs, document your network plan (including VLANs), and know how to cut off segments quickly. If something goes wrong, knowing exactly how your network is supposed to be laid out is half the fix.
Each of these came from real firefights. In the field, secure design isn’t a guarantee—it’s the starting point. The final safety comes from vigilance: validate that design, continuously monitor it, and never assume a zone is truly sealed off. By learning from each mis-step, you turn “lesson learned” into “lesson taught.”
← Back to blog